THE HYPOTHETICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF PRESUIT AND PRETRIAL DISCOVERY IN CIVIL LITIGATION IN BRAZIL

Rafael Gomiero Pitta, Eduardo Salomão Cambi

Resumo


When analyzing quantitative data from the common law and civil law family systems of justice, the first striking comparative difference that draws attention is the number of cases solved in the early stages in the common law systems. In both England and the United States (USA) there is a high degree of efficiency in settling cases even before the trial stage. Although there is no such thing as Anglo-American law, especially given the distinctions that the English and North American models have shown in recent decades, the instruments used in the civil justice systems of these two countries are fertile ground for the study of possible solutions to be implemented in Brazil. This article presents the mentioned solutions of the so called Anglo-American system and elaborates a proposal for reforms able to introduce such methods in the Brazilian procedural system.

Palavras-chave


comparative law; procedural techniques; presuit discovery; dispute resolution

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


BARBOSA MOREIRA, José Carlos. O processo Civil Brasileiro entre dois mundos, 2001, Revista da EMERJ, v. 4, n. 16, 2001.

______. O Processo Civil Contemporâneo: um enfoque comparativo, Revista da EMERJ, v. 6, n. 24, 2003.

BRASIL. Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Justiça em Números 2018: ano-base 2017/Conselho Nacional de Justiça - Brasília: CNJ, 2018. Disponível em: http://www.cnj.jus.br/pesquisas-judiciarias/justicaemnumeros/2016-10-21-13-13-04/pj-justica-em-numeros

CAMBI, Eduardo; DOTTI, Rogéria; PINHEIRO, Paulo Eduardo d´Arce; MARTINS, Sandro Gilbert; KOZIKOSKI, Sandro Marcelo. Curso de Processo Civil completo. 2ª ed. São Paulo: RT, 2019.

CHASE, Oscar G.; HERSHKOFF, Helen; SILBERMAN, Linda; SORABJI, John; STÜRNER, Rolf; TANIGUCHI, Yasahei; VARANO, Vicenzo. Civil litigation in comparative context. ed. Oscar G. Chase and Helen Hershkoff, West Academic, 2017.

DAMASKA, Mirjan. The uncertain fate of evidentiary transplants: Anglo-American and Continental Experiments, American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 45, 1997.

DODSON, Scott. New Pleading, New discovery, Issue I, Michigan Law, vol. 109, Review. 53, 2010.

DIDIER JUNIOR, Fredie; BRAGA, Paula Sarno. Ações probatórias autônomas: produção antecipada de prova e justificação. Revista de Processo, v. 38, n. 218, p. 13-45, abr. 2013.

DIDIER JUNIOR, Fredie; CUNHA, Leonardo Jose Carneiro da; BRAGA, Paula Sarno; OLIVEIRA, Rafael Alexandria de. Curso de Direito Processual Civil. Vol.2. 9ª ed. Salvador: Juspodivm, 2014.

DONDI, Ângelo; ANSANELLI, Vincenzo; COMOGLIO, Paolo. Procesos civiles em evolución: uma perspectiva comparada. Tradução de Jose María Salgado. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2017.

HUBBARD, William H.J., Two Models of Pleadings, (unpublished working paper) 2013.

KINDER-GEST, Patricia. Droit Anglais: institutions politiques et judiciaires. 3º ed. Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence (LGDJ), 1997.

MARCUS, Richard L., Modes of Procedural Reform, 31 Hastings Int’l & Comp. l. Rev. 157, 2008.

NEVES, Daniel Amorim Assumpção. Ações Probatórias Autônomas. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2008.

RAGLAND, George, Jr. Discovery before trial. Chicago: Callaghan and Company, 1932.

ROSENBAUM, Samuel. Studies in English Civil Procedure. II. The Rule-Making Authority, University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register, Vol. 63, No. 3 (Jan., 1915).

SIME, Stuart. A practical approach to civil procedure. 5ª ed. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2002.

SUBRIN, Stephen N. Fishing expedition allowed: the historical background of the 1938 federal discovery rules, Boston College Law Review, v.39:69, 1998.

SWARD, Ellen E. Values, Ideology, and the Evolution of the Adversary System, Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 64 : Iss. 2 , Article 4, 1989.

TALAMINI, Eduardo, Produção antecipada de prova no Código de Processo Civil de 2015 Revista de Processo, vol. 260, p. 75 – 101, Out / 2016.

TEPLY, Larry L.; WHITTEN, Ralph U.. Civil Procedure. New York: Foundation Press, 2000.

YARSHELL, Flávio Luiz. Antecipação da Prova sem o requisito da urgência e direito autônomo à prova. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2009.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2020.v27i10.6216

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Bookmark and Share